Senza titolo

  • Archive
  • April 8, 2013 10:24 pm
    rhamphotheca:

Grinnell Glacier is in the heart of Glacier National Park in the U.S. state of Montana. The glacier is named for George Bird Grinnell, an early American conservationist and explorer, who was also a strong advocate of ensuring the creation of Glacier National Park. The glacier is in the Lewis Range and rests on the north flank of Mount Gould at an altitude averaging 7,000 feet (2,100 m), in the Many Glacier region of the park…
(read more: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grinnell_Glacier)              
(photo: Mountain_Walrus | Wiki)

    rhamphotheca:

    Grinnell Glacier is in the heart of Glacier National Park in the U.S. state of Montana. The glacier is named for George Bird Grinnell, an early American conservationist and explorer, who was also a strong advocate of ensuring the creation of Glacier National Park. The glacier is in the Lewis Range and rests on the north flank of Mount Gould at an altitude averaging 7,000 feet (2,100 m), in the Many Glacier region of the park…

    (read more: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grinnell_Glacier)              

    (photo: Mountain_Walrus | Wiki)

    (via geologyrocks)

    Like Reblog
    via rhamphotheca
    ➜
  • April 8, 2013 10:07 pm

    geneticist:

    -

    High resolution hypersaturated photo of the moon by Noel Carboni. 

    Like Reblog
    via geneticist
    ➜
  • April 8, 2013 10:07 pm
    prozac95:

Jbel Saghro

    prozac95:

    Jbel Saghro

    (via geologyrocks)

    Like Reblog
    via prozac95
    ➜
  • April 8, 2013 10:03 pm
    rikkiirager:

Jamaica Coastal Landscape

    rikkiirager:

    Jamaica Coastal Landscape

    (via geologyrocks)

    Like Reblog
    via weheartit.com
    ➜
  • April 8, 2013 10:02 pm

    scienceetfiction:

    Why Do Objects Float in Orbit? 

    A spacecraft could go so far from Earth that a person would feel very little gravity. But this is not why things float on the International Space Station. The space station orbits Earth at about 200 to 250 miles high. At that height, Earth’s gravity is still very strong. In fact, a person who weighs 100 pounds on the ground would weigh 90 pounds there. 

    So why do astronauts float in space? The answer is that they are in free fall. Gravity pulls all objects the same way, even if they are different sizes. If you drop a hammer and a feather on Earth, the hammer will fall faster. But that is not because gravity pulls them differently. Air makes the feather fall more slowly. If there were no air, they would fall together at the same speed. Some amusement parks have free-fall rides. On those rides, a cabin falls along a tall tower. If you let go of a ball at the start of the fall, you and the ball would fall together. The ball would appear to float in front of you! That is what happens in a spacecraft. The spacecraft, its crew and everything aboard are all falling around Earth. Since they are all falling together, the crew and objects appear to float. 

    How Can Spacecraft Fall Around Earth? 

    What does it mean to “fall around Earth”? Earth’s gravity pulls objects toward the surface. Gravity pulls on the space station, too. As a result, it is falling toward Earth’s surface. The station also is moving very fast. It moves so fast it matches the way Earth’s surface curves. If you throw a baseball, gravity will cause it to curve down. It will hit the ground soon. 

    A spacecraft in orbit moves at the right speed so that the curve of its fall matches the curve of Earth. For the space station, that speed is 17,500 miles per hour. The spacecraft keeps falling toward the ground but never hits it. Instead, it falls around the planet. The moon stays in orbit around Earth for this same reason. The moon also is falling around Earth. 

    from Nasa: What is Microgravity ?, first picture via physics.uiowa, second one Nasa

    Like Reblog
    via scienceetfiction
    ➜
  • April 8, 2013 10:02 pm
    mineralia:

Arsenopyrite with Quartz and Fluorite from China
by Dan Weinrich

    mineralia:

    Arsenopyrite with Quartz and Fluorite from China

    by Dan Weinrich

    Like Reblog
    via mineralia
    ➜
  • April 8, 2013 10:01 pm
    sagansense:

Surprise from the Lava Lake at Antarctica’s Erebus
image: The lava lake at Antarctica’s Erebus, seen in December 2011. credit: Clive Oppenheimer / Volcanofiles.
Lava lakes are a relatively rare volcanic features — there are only a handful of active ones on the planet. Kilauea (with two), Ambrym, Villarrica, Nyiragongo, Erta’Ale, a fairly new, possibly ephemeral lake at Tolbachik and probably the most remote lava lake of them all, Erebus in Antarctica. The Erebus lava lake as been a persistent feature on the volcano for decades (if not longer). However, it’s remote location means it is normally monitored by satellite unless conditions allow for a team to reach the summit of the volcano from McMurdo Station (see above). As the southern hemisphere begins to head into fall, just such an opportunity came last week, so geologists from McMurdo set off to view the lava lake.
What they found took everyone by surprise (including me). It has long been thought that life arose around volcano features like active vents and thermal features — we’ve seen clear documentation of all sorts of life around black smokers around Antarctica and even bacteria living in very hot vents in places like the Yellowstone caldera. However, life in a place like Erebus has never been documented before. Dr. Julian Bashir from the US Antarctic Survey said it best: “as we descended the slope towards the Erebus lava lake, we were all struck by the strange sounds that were emanating from the crater. The haze of steam and volcanic gases finally lifted as the wind shifted some and much to our amazement, we could see something actually moving around on the lava lake!” The team was only able to take a few quick shots of before conditions worsened, but if this sighting proves to be true, our understanding of how life arose on our planet — and others in the solar system — could be changed forever.

    sagansense:

    Surprise from the Lava Lake at Antarctica’s Erebus

    image: The lava lake at Antarctica’s Erebus, seen in December 2011. credit: Clive Oppenheimer / Volcanofiles.

    Lava lakes are a relatively rare volcanic features — there are only a handful of active ones on the planet. Kilauea (with two), Ambrym, Villarrica, Nyiragongo, Erta’Ale, a fairly new, possibly ephemeral lake at Tolbachik and probably the most remote lava lake of them all, Erebus in Antarctica. The Erebus lava lake as been a persistent feature on the volcano for decades (if not longer). However, it’s remote location means it is normally monitored by satellite unless conditions allow for a team to reach the summit of the volcano from McMurdo Station (see above). As the southern hemisphere begins to head into fall, just such an opportunity came last week, so geologists from McMurdo set off to view the lava lake.

    What they found took everyone by surprise (including me). It has long been thought that life arose around volcano features like active vents and thermal features — we’ve seen clear documentation of all sorts of life around black smokers around Antarctica and even bacteria living in very hot vents in places like the Yellowstone caldera. However, life in a place like Erebus has never been documented before. Dr. Julian Bashir from the US Antarctic Survey said it best: “as we descended the slope towards the Erebus lava lake, we were all struck by the strange sounds that were emanating from the crater. The haze of steam and volcanic gases finally lifted as the wind shifted some and much to our amazement, we could see something actually moving around on the lava lake!” The team was only able to take a few quick shots of before conditions worsened, but if this sighting proves to be true, our understanding of how life arose on our planet — and others in the solar system — could be changed forever.

    (via geologyrocks)

    Like Reblog
    via sagansense
    ➜
  • April 8, 2013 10:00 pm
    n-architektur:

Zeppelin near the Empire State Building under construction
via Nationaal Archief

    n-architektur:

    Zeppelin near the Empire State Building under construction

    via Nationaal Archief

    (via skyscraper)

    Like Reblog
    via n-architektur
    ➜
  • April 8, 2013 10:00 pm
    gallantcannibal:

A stone face at Zion. Taken last summer by me.

    gallantcannibal:

    A stone face at Zion. Taken last summer by me.

    Like Reblog
    via Flickr / anatotitan
    ➜
  • March 25, 2013 10:28 pm
    scienceetfiction:

The European Space Agency released the most accurate and detailed map of the oldest light in the Universe. The radiation originally formed about 380,000 years after the Big Bang, when all matter was created some 13.82 billion years ago.
The images, released on Thursday (March 21 2013), suggest that at 13.84 billion years the universe is older than previously thought - albeit by only 48 million years.
They also suggest it contains slightly more matter than expected and a little less “dark energy”, the mysterious force which is believed to drive the expansion of the universe.

Although the measurements made by Planck match the theoretical predictions of what the Universe should look like, there are some important differences, such as a notable asymmetry between the opposite hemispheres of the sky and a “cold spot” that extends over a much larger patch of the sky than expected.
“The fact that Planck has made such a significant detection of these anomalies erases any doubts about their reality; it can no longer be said that they are artefacts of the measurements. They are real and we have to look for a credible explanation,” said Paolo Natoli of Ferrara University in Italy.
Sources: The Independent and The Telegraph

    scienceetfiction:

    The European Space Agency released the most accurate and detailed map of the oldest light in the Universe. The radiation originally formed about 380,000 years after the Big Bang, when all matter was created some 13.82 billion years ago.

    • The images, released on Thursday (March 21 2013), suggest that at 13.84 billion years the universe is older than previously thought - albeit by only 48 million years.
    • They also suggest it contains slightly more matter than expected and a little less “dark energy”, the mysterious force which is believed to drive the expansion of the universe.
    • Although the measurements made by Planck match the theoretical predictions of what the Universe should look like, there are some important differences, such as a notable asymmetry between the opposite hemispheres of the sky and a “cold spot” that extends over a much larger patch of the sky than expected.

      “The fact that Planck has made such a significant detection of these anomalies erases any doubts about their reality; it can no longer be said that they are artefacts of the measurements. They are real and we have to look for a credible explanation,” said Paolo Natoli of Ferrara University in Italy.

      Sources: The Independent and The Telegraph

    Like Reblog
    via scienceetfiction
    ➜
Archive Older ▶
  • Archive

Paper Stacks, a collaboration by FiftyThree and ALLDAYEVERYDAY.